Splitting the audio input and output to two TRS connections

#1

Hi, I'm wondering how to split the mono TRS output into two TRS signals?

#2

You can split the TRS Stereo Output to two TS Mono Outputs if thats what you mean.

I use one of these on both my input and my output of the axo so I can run my guitar into the axo, run an effects loop, then out of the axo into my amp and it works great. Just be sure you're using the correct mono Audio/Out objects for each line rather than the usual stereo out object

#3

no I want two TRS outputs maybe even two inputs

#4

stereo input and output

#5

I believe you could use these on the output/input ..this will let you send two separate stereo inputs into the axo and double the output so you can run to two separate amps/effects boards/etc

If you're thinking to have two separate stereo inputs/outputs that are different audio lines though, as far as I know it is not possible with the ADC/DAC on the Axo

#6

axoloti has stereo input and output. via trs jacks. you can use a stereo to two mono cable to get two separate cable outputs. if your question is regarding balanced outputs, then no, the axoloti does not have that

#7

Looking for balanced connections :frowning:

#8

so is it possible with some other circuitry to create this effect?

#9

yes, with a stereo d.i. box you can get balanced outputs for example.

#10

but that would need to be powered separately... And I'm trying to make a product that requires one power supply plugged into it.

#11

you could either use a passive DI box or a 9v powered one that runs on the same power supply as the axoloti. or you can google "diy DI box' and throw together a circuit that might be able to run on AXOs 3.3v or 5v outputs.

#12

The core of a passive DJ box is a transformer, so if you get hold of an audio transformer with a 1:1 winding ratio you could make a little balanced-unbalanced converter with no external power supply.

#13

true! you will need two of them for stereo output, four for input and output. i wonder just out of curiosity, why do you need balanced outputs?

#14

creed.jpg970x546 241 KB

#15

That's what DI are made for.
Unless you're running very long cables in a noisy area, it's generally better to keep unbalanced connexion.

#16

+1 for unbalanced unless operating in harsh conditions, BUT an IC solution using balanced line receivers and balanced line drivers could work, be compact, and not be prohibitively expensive...
Had good experiences with THAT Corp devices/ support in the past.
scx