congratulations @johannes - great news, you've done so much hard work - great to see it out in the wild.
I think a very wise move
congratulations @johannes - great news, you've done so much hard work - great to see it out in the wild.
I think a very wise move
ehm, perhaps a bit late to note.. but I just thought of something that would be nice to have on the board:
Buffering the inputs independently so that two mics could be directly connected to the inputs without the need of an external buffering.
Atm, when you connect two mics/piezo's, they start influencing each other, so they both need to be buffered independently before you connect them to the inputs. So it would be nice if it would be possible to connect these without adding an extra buffer circuit, though I'm not sure this could be done with the current stereo input as it has the common ground, which is probably also the reason the signals should be buffered first.
Please make axoloti 2.0 in form factor of Pocket operator:
Same size
Same set of the buttons
Same captions
2 or more endless (or cAtching) pots
2 aaa batteries
Big Oleg screen
Same tactile buttons
Addressable rgbs on buttons
And please small 3.5 jacks instead of full size midi
Any artist will pay you fortune (if application to emulate pocket operator in Ableton with sync to axoloti will be developed)
Full size midi sockets were designed the way they were for a good reason! The mini jack midi sockets are a non sense.
MIDI has no acknoledge nor error detection system (put aside the sysexes).
The DIN socket offers robust tubular electrical contacts that are reliable mecanically and electrically.
Jacks have ponctual electrical contacts and mini jacks are not what i call mecanically robust.
Axoloti 2.0 is not about new hardware, but about new software, a.k.a. Axoloti Patcher.
If you want an enclosure with knobs, oled screens, buttons, etc, you can build that yourself or buy an Axoctrl from HohumLabs or AxoControl from MusicThingModular.